The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has issued a declaration that has disrupted the realm of contracts for difference (CFDs) and binary options websites. The new regulations will ensure that authentic operators remain alluring to investors, otherwise other operators will seize their position.
The FCA’s statement is a significant event in the world of CFDs and binary options. However, any new regulations must guarantee that authentic operators remain appealing to investors, otherwise other operators will take their place.
It’s not positive news for listed CFD providers, whose stock prices have experienced a significant decline this week. This type of market instability typically attracts investors in large numbers.
The initial action came from the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), which on November 30th released new regulations prohibiting bonus incentives on all financial products.
The agency also declared that it would no longer permit Cypriot Investment Firms (CIFs) to provide leverage exceeding 50 times the initial investment.
Nevertheless, if the Cypriot Securities and Exchange Commission’s move was a cautionary signal, then the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority’s suggestion on December 6th to restrict leverage to between 25 and 50 times was a direct hit to the sector.
IG Group’s shares plummeted 40% on the day, and its competitors CMC Markets and Plus 500 also fared poorly. In total, the three firms lost over £1.5 billion in market valuation.
Alarmingly, the FCA specifically targeted binary options, the most contentious financial trading product, which is a negative development for the rest of the industry, particularly those operators that function in the binary options market.
Christopher Woolard, the FCA’s director of strategy and competition, stated that the agency was concerned that binary options were a “risk to investor protection” and said they raised questions about whether they “fulfilled a genuine investment need.”
In 2015, the UK government declared that the product would be transferred from the Gambling Commission’s authority to the FCA’s in order to align UK regulation with other European nations in advance of the implementation of MiFID II, compelling the FCA to take on the hot potato of binary options.
The FCA’s aversion to being handed this hot potato was apparent in its remarks.
The end is nigh
This is almost certainly an existential threat for binary options providers. As a Citi analyst stated in a report on Tuesday, other European nations may now follow the FCAs lead.
Indeed, Belgium has already prohibited all consumer-facing financial trading items, while the Netherlands and France have outlawed all promotion of such items.
Sources suggest that with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority openly expressing worries about the product itself, it’s easy to envision other European regulators following suit with a complete prohibition on binary options.
This presents a gloomy outlook for the industry, but major spread betting providers are hopeful that this will mark the beginning of a more positive future.
A report from RBC Europe highlights that companies like IG and CMC Markets (and to a lesser degree Plus 500) are merely “collateral damage” in the regulatory crackdown, which is clearly aimed elsewhere.
Leverage limitations will undoubtedly have a negative impact in the short term. Citi analysis reveals that when Japanese authorities implemented similar measures, reducing the cap in two stages to 50 times initial margin and then to 25 times, IG’s business was reduced by more than half.
However, stricter regulation has also raised the entry barrier. Numis analyst James Hamilton points out that major providers’ clients are experienced and do not utilize the maximum leverage available to them.
“However, this should extend the trading lifespan of clients, supporting long-term revenue growth,” he added.
Bridging the gap
CMC Markets did identify a positive aspect yesterday.
The firm declared that it has always been dedicated to “concentrating on high-value, seasoned, quality customers” who comprehend the offerings and inherent hazards.
The firm also mentioned that over the past five years, a critical component of its customer-centric proposal has been ongoing client instruction, encompassing the market, offerings, and associated hazards. The firm stated its business model and ongoing strategy concentrate on generating revenue from client transaction expenses, thus believing in building long-term client connections.
IG itself alluded to the “collateral damage” aspect of recent occurrences, stating in a declaration, “acknowledging that there are flaws in the marketing techniques of some businesses in CFDs and binary options.”
Naturally, major listed firms now also include Playtech, which entered the field in April 2015 when it acquired the TradeFX business from major shareholder Teddy Sagi for an initial $224 million.
The firm operates the Markets.com financial trading website, and although not as severe in terms of share price – down approximately 7% over the past week – the news still impacted the sector.
Canaccord analyst Simon Davies indicated that the firm has exited binary options and that Markets.com’s average leverage is substantially lower than the new proposed restrictions.
He added, “Moreover, any impact to short-term financial profits would diminish the potential upside of the acquisition by a maximum of €320 million.”
This division also has ample space for self-improvement.
Although firms like CMC or Markets may not be impacted by the new regulations, some other less cautious and unsupervised businesses might view this as an opportunity to draw in clients seeking to capitalize on higher leverage limits.
Any new regulations will have this effect on any industry, but in the case of CFDs or binary options, it implies that player funds are not shielded and deposits are not insured.
It’s also crucial to remember that those who decide to participate on these platforms have a diminished likelihood of winning any prizes.
The Financial Conduct Authority and other concerned parties will thoroughly deliberate on all these matters during the consultation period, which concludes in March.
As previously stated, new rules always have a cascading effect, but for CFDs and binary options, the figures are substantial, and the FCA needs to strike a balance between stringent rules and ensuring that a legitimate market is appealing to both businesses and consumers.
Sign up for the iGaming Newsletter